Breadcrumb
null
Age: 38.05 years (+/- a standard deviation of 4.7)
Gender: 120 females
Time since diagnosis of Obesity: N/A
Severity of the disease: 30.5 (+/- a standard deviation of 2.75)
Multi-morbidity: N/A
COMPAR-EU RCTs Web
Weight loss by mobile phone: A 1-year effectiveness study
Author: Haapala, I.
Country/countries: Finland
Number of patients participating in the study: 125
This study was focused on patients living with Obesity
Intervention analysed in the study: Usual Care Plus
Intervention components: UCP
See more Setting of implementation: N/A Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
See more Setting of implementation: N/A Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
Components
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Intervention analysed in the study: Monitoring and action-based behavioural techniques
Intervention components: E+MT+AB
See more Setting of implementation: Virtual location Professionals delivering the intervention: Service Targeted self-management behaviours: Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Eating behaviours, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring
See more Setting of implementation: Virtual location Professionals delivering the intervention: Service Targeted self-management behaviours: Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Eating behaviours, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring
Components
Education (E)
Monitoring techniques (MT)
Action-based behavioural change techniques (AB)
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Outcomes measured in the study
Outcome | Measure | Tool |
---|---|---|
Self-efficacy | Eating Self-efficacy | N/A |
Weight management | Weight (Kgs/lbs) | N/A |
Weight management | Waist size | N/A |
Patient characteristics
Number of co-morbidities: N/A
Tool: N/A
Risk of Bias of this study
Outcome | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding performance | Blinding detection objective outcomes assessment | Attrition incomplete outcome | Incorrect statistical methods | Recruitment bias | Selective outcome reporting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Self-efficacy - Eating Self-efficacy | ||||||||
Weight management - Weight (Kgs/lbs) | ||||||||
Weight management - Waist size |
Learn more about the intervention: Monitoring and action-based behavioural techniques
Recommendations for this type of intervention | |
Summary of findings | |
Evidence to Decision frameworks | |
RCTs that also analysed this type of intervention | |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|