Breadcrumb
null
Age: 56.93 years (+/- a standard deviation of 7.28)
Gender: N/A
Time since diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: N/A
Severity of the disease: 7.44 (+/- a standard deviation of 1.39)
Multi-morbidity: N/A
COMPAR-EU RCTs Web
The effect of the BATHE interview technique on the empowerment of diabetic patients in primary care: A cluster randomised controlled study
Author: Akturan, S.
Country/countries: N/A
Number of patients participating in the study: 112
This study was focused on patients living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention analysed in the study: Usual Care Plus
Intervention components: UCP
See more Setting of implementation: N/A Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
See more Setting of implementation: N/A Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
Components
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Intervention analysed in the study: Emotional- based intervention behavioural techniques without provision of educational information
Intervention components: EB
See more Setting of implementation: Primary care centers (GPs) Professionals delivering the intervention: Physicians Targeted self-management behaviours: Handling /managing emotions
See more Setting of implementation: Primary care centers (GPs) Professionals delivering the intervention: Physicians Targeted self-management behaviours: Handling /managing emotions
Components
Emotional-based change techniques (EB)
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Outcomes measured in the study
Outcome | Measure | Tool |
---|---|---|
HbA1C | Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | N/A |
Self-efficacy | Self-efficacy | N/A |
Weight (management) | BMI - Body Mass Index | N/A |
Patient characteristics
Number of co-morbidities: N/A
Tool: N/A
Risk of Bias of this study
Outcome | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding performance | Blinding detection objective outcomes assessment | Attrition incomplete outcome | Incorrect statistical methods | Recruitment bias | Selective outcome reporting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HbA1C - Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | ||||||||
Self-efficacy - Self-efficacy | ||||||||
Weight (management) - BMI - Body Mass Index |
Learn more about the intervention: Emotional- based intervention behavioural techniques without provision of educational information
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that also analysed this type of intervention | |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|