Breadcrumb
null
Age: 61.0 years (+/- a standard deviation of 54.0)
Gender: N/A
Time since diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: N/A
Severity of the disease: N/A
Multi-morbidity: N/A
COMPAR-EU RCTs Web
Effectiveness of peer-led self-management coaching for patients recently diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: a randomized controlled trial
Author: van der Wulp, I.
Country/countries: N/A
Number of patients participating in the study: 133
This study was focused on patients living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention analysed in the study: Usual Care Plus
Intervention components: UCP
See more Setting of implementation: N/A Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
See more Setting of implementation: N/A Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
Components
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Intervention analysed in the study: Action-based and emotional-based behavioural techniques, lead by peers
Intervention components: E+AB+EB+P
See more Setting of implementation: Home-care Professionals delivering the intervention: Peer Targeted self-management behaviours: Eating behaviours, Physical activity /exercise
See more Setting of implementation: Home-care Professionals delivering the intervention: Peer Targeted self-management behaviours: Eating behaviours, Physical activity /exercise
Components
Education (E)
Action-based behavioural change techniques (AB)
Emotional-based change techniques (EB)
Peers (P)
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Outcomes measured in the study
Outcome | Measure | Tool |
---|---|---|
Dietary habits | Dietary habits | N/A |
Physical activity | Physical activity | N/A |
Quality of life | Psychological distress | RAND Mental component |
Self-efficacy | Self-efficacy | N/A |
Patient characteristics
Number of co-morbidities: N/A
Tool: N/A
Risk of Bias of this study
Outcome | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding performance | Blinding detection objective outcomes assessment | Attrition incomplete outcome | Incorrect statistical methods | Recruitment bias | Selective outcome reporting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical activity - Physical activity | ||||||||
Quality of life - Psychological distress | ||||||||
Self-efficacy - Self-efficacy |
Learn more about the intervention: Action-based and emotional-based behavioural techniques, lead by peers
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that also analysed this type of intervention | |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|