Breadcrumb
null
Age: 60.0 years (+/- a standard deviation of 10.0)
Gender: 89 females
Time since diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: N/A
Severity of the disease: 8.5 (+/- a standard deviation of 0.65)
Multi-morbidity: N/A
COMPAR-EU RCTs Web
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial
Link:
10.7326/m16-2855
Author: Beck, R. W.
Country/countries: United States
Number of patients participating in the study: 158
This study was focused on patients living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention analysed in the study: Usual Care Plus
Intervention components: UCP
See more Setting of implementation: Community-based care Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: Self-monitoring
See more Setting of implementation: Community-based care Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: Self-monitoring
Components
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Intervention analysed in the study: Education based intervention
Intervention components: E
See more Setting of implementation: Community-based care Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: Device management, Self-monitoring
See more Setting of implementation: Community-based care Professionals delivering the intervention: N/A Targeted self-management behaviours: Device management, Self-monitoring
Components
Education (E)
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Outcomes measured in the study
Outcome | Measure | Tool |
---|---|---|
HbA1C | Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | N/A |
Quality of life | Quality of life | N/A |
Quality of life | Quality of life | N/A |
Quality of life | Psychological distress | Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) |
Patient characteristics
Number of co-morbidities: N/A
Tool: N/A
Risk of Bias of this study
Outcome | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding performance | Blinding detection objective outcomes assessment | Attrition incomplete outcome | Incorrect statistical methods | Recruitment bias | Selective outcome reporting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HbA1C - Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | ||||||||
Quality of life - Quality of life | ||||||||
Quality of life - Psychological distress |
Learn more about the intervention: Education based intervention
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that also analysed this type of intervention | |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|