Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

null

COMPAR-EU Isof Web

Shared decision making delivered remotely Vs Usual Care

Patient or population:

Adults with COPD

Setting:

outpatient

Deterministic Network meta-analysis (NMA)

1. Mortality / All causes of mortality

Footnotes per outcome:
1) a) We rated down the certainty of evidence due to very serious risk of bias; b) Number of studies included in the network: 15 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 1 RCT(s) (N=122); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: 0 comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network. The range of follow-up was 1 months in the studies directly comparing the self-management intervention versus usual care.

References of studies informing direct evidence:
1) Lavesen-2016

Formulier

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

Zoekbalk

Taalkiezer

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

COMPAR-EU Isof Web

Shared decision making delivered remotely Vs Usual Care

Formulier

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb

Zoekbalk

Zoekbalk

Taalkiezer

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Broodkruimel

COMPAR-EU Isof Web

Shared decision making delivered remotely Vs Usual Care

Formulier

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb