Broodkruimel
COMPAR-EU Interventies Web
Monitoring techniques delivered in groups
See more
This intervention has been tested in for people living with the following disease(s). Click on the name of the disease to see more details.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: N/A
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 1396
Setting of implementation: , Community-based care, Home-care, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Diabetologists, Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Endocrinologists, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, certified exercise instructor, scheduler and clinic administrator, yoga expert
Targeted self-management behaviours: Being able to work, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Fitting in at work, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction, Social roles
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Heart Failure
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Brazil, United States, Lebanon, Turkey, China, Germany
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 505
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs)
Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator, Nurses, Physicians
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
COPD
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United Kingdom, Netherlands, Taiwan, Denmark, Spain, China
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 440
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator, Nurses, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Service
Targeted self-management behaviours: Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Obesity
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United States, Germany, Japan, HK, Iran, Australia
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 721
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), The intervention occurred at the Physical Activity and Weight Management Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh.,, Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Pastor, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Research Assistant/personal trainer, Service
Targeted self-management behaviours: Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Eating behaviours, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Formulier
Components
Education (E)
Education (E)
Sharing information. This form of support consists in sharing of information about self-management topics like coping with symptoms, diet, exercise, medication, information about what other people are doing, and information about the disease itself, or about any other relevant aspects that could lead to improved self-management, and ultimately better health. This information can be told or distributed in printed materials like a folder or workbook, or via website or DVD.
Examples: Educational session on healthy eating for people with obesity, provision of a printed leaflet on the importance of foot care in diabetes, or a link to a website with information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care.
Monitoring techniques (MT)
Monitoring techniques (MT)
Self-monitoring training and feedback. Training and encouraging people to recognize, monitor, and record behaviours, symptoms, or clinical data. This process may include regular feedback from a clinician, or a synopsis of information registered in a digital tool to encourage you to continue monitoring your illness and behaviours.
Example: Showing a patient how to record blood sugar levels, physical activity, or pain.
In group
Two or more patients or caregivers receive a self-management intervention. Group interventions are normally organized for efficiency purposes or to facilitate learning and knowledge exchange among peers (people living with the same health condition). For example, peer-led education group to enhance physical activity in obese individuals.
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.