Broodkruimel
COMPAR-EU Interventies Web
Education delivered remotely
See more
This intervention has been tested in for people living with the following disease(s). Click on the name of the disease to see more details.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Germany, Ireland, Taiwan, United Kingdom
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 15642
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Outpatient care (hospital), The study was conducted in a location convenient to the
participant. These locations included the Salt Lake City VA
library, a room adjacent to the exercise room at the diabetes
exercise group, a table at a diabetes health fair, a meeting room
at a public library, and a private office., Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator, Nurses, Pharmacists, Self care/investigator, Service
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Condition-specific behaviours, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Heart Failure
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United States, Sweden, China
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 1309
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Healthcare assistant, Nurses, Physicians, Service
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
COPD
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Denmark, United States
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 79
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Nurses, Physicians
Targeted self-management behaviours: Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Obesity
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United States, Denmark, United Kingdom
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 2425
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Service
Targeted self-management behaviours: Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Condition-specific behaviours, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Healthy sleep habits, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Formulier
Components
Education (E)
Education (E)
Sharing information. This form of support consists in sharing of information about self-management topics like coping with symptoms, diet, exercise, medication, information about what other people are doing, and information about the disease itself, or about any other relevant aspects that could lead to improved self-management, and ultimately better health. This information can be told or distributed in printed materials like a folder or workbook, or via website or DVD.
Examples: Educational session on healthy eating for people with obesity, provision of a printed leaflet on the importance of foot care in diabetes, or a link to a website with information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care.
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Remote
When patients (and/or caregivers) are not in the same place as the health care providers. This interaction can take place through different communication means or tools (e.g., telephone, smartphone, Internet).