Ruta de navegación
COMPAR-EU Web Intervenciones
Education delivered in groups
See more
This intervention has been tested in for people living with the following disease(s). Click on the name of the disease to see more details.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: N/A
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 2576
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Longterm care centres and nursing homes, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs)
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Social worker
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Heart Failure
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Sweden, Iran, United States
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 329
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Longterm care centres and nursing homes, Outpatient care (hospital)
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Social worker
Targeted self-management behaviours: Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Condition-specific behaviours, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
COPD
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United Kingdom, Spain, Norway, Sweden, Netherlands, Australia, France, United States, Iran, China, Japan
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 787
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital)
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Nurses, Ocuppational therapist, Physicians, Physiotherapists, professional facilitators
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Fitting in at work, Handling /managing emotions, Healthy sleep habits, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction, Social roles
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Recommendations for this type of intervention | |
| |
Summary of findings | |
Evidence to Decision frameworks | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Obesity
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Finland, United States, Iran, Brazil, Denmark, China, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Australia, Sweden, Ireland
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 3975
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Workplace
Professionals delivering the intervention: Chef and health promotionist, Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Nurses, Physicians, Physiotherapists, instructor from Aerobics and Fitness Association of America (AFAA)
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Formulario
Components
Education (E)
Education (E)
Sharing information. This form of support consists in sharing of information about self-management topics like coping with symptoms, diet, exercise, medication, information about what other people are doing, and information about the disease itself, or about any other relevant aspects that could lead to improved self-management, and ultimately better health. This information can be told or distributed in printed materials like a folder or workbook, or via website or DVD.
Examples: Educational session on healthy eating for people with obesity, provision of a printed leaflet on the importance of foot care in diabetes, or a link to a website with information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care.
In group
Two or more patients or caregivers receive a self-management intervention. Group interventions are normally organized for efficiency purposes or to facilitate learning and knowledge exchange among peers (people living with the same health condition). For example, peer-led education group to enhance physical activity in obese individuals.
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.