Fil d'Ariane
null
Outils web COMPAR-EU
The SDM Process_4 score was calculated based on responses to four questions about how much the pros and cons of the decision were discussed. The 12 items, each scored from 1 (strongly disagree or “poor”) to 5 (strongly agree or “excellent”) with a maximum score of 60.
Year: 2010
Authors: Zikmund-Fisher
Disease: T2DM
Outcome: Participation and decisions making
See more tools that use this outcome Measure: Satisfaction with the decision-making process
See more tools that use this measure Number of RCTs that used this tool (in our study): 1
See the RCTs Scale: Higher scores are better, scores range 12-60 Reference: Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Levin, C. A., Fowler, F. J., Ziniel, S., Ubel, P. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2010). The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical Decisions. Medical Decision Making, 30(5_suppl), 20–34.
See more tools that use this outcome Measure: Satisfaction with the decision-making process
See more tools that use this measure Number of RCTs that used this tool (in our study): 1
See the RCTs Scale: Higher scores are better, scores range 12-60 Reference: Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Couper, M. P., Singer, E., Levin, C. A., Fowler, F. J., Ziniel, S., Ubel, P. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2010). The DECISIONS Study: A Nationwide Survey of United States Adults Regarding 9 Common Medical Decisions. Medical Decision Making, 30(5_suppl), 20–34.
Target population: General population
Focus Generic
Translations available: Unclear
Original version validated: Yes
Original language: English
Form of delivery: Self-reported
Licence needed: Unclear
10.1177/0272989X09353792