Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

null

Isof web COMPAR-EU

Action-based behavioural techniques delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Patient or population:

Adults with COPD

Setting:

outpatient

Deterministic Network meta-analysis (NMA)

1. Physical activity / Muscle strenght / Exercise capacity

2. Qualiy of life / Quality of life (specific-disease instruments)

Footnotes per outcome:
1) We rated down the certainty of evidence due to very serious imprecision and very serious risk of bias
2) a) We rated down the certainty of evidence due to very serious risk of bias, and very serious imprecision;b) Number of studies included in the network: 8 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 1 RCT(s) (N=143); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: 0 comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network. The range of follow-up was 2 months in the studies directly comparing the self-management intervention versus usual care.

References of studies informing direct evidence:
1) Gillespie-2013
2) Gillespie-2013

Formulaire

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

Barre de recherche

Sélecteur de Langue

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Isof web COMPAR-EU

Action-based behavioural techniques delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Formulaire

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb

Barre de recherche

Barre de recherche

Sélecteur de Langue

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Fil d'Ariane

Isof web COMPAR-EU

Action-based behavioural techniques delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Formulaire

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb