Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

null

Isof web COMPAR-EU

Education delivered remotely Vs Usual Care

Patient or population:

Adults with COPD

Setting:

outpatient

Deterministic Network meta-analysis (NMA)

1. Self-efficacy

Footnotes per outcome:
1) a) We rated down the certainty of evidence due to very serious risk of bias and serious imprecision;b) Number of studies included in the network: 25 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 1 RCT(s) (N=22); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: 1 comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network. The range of follow-up was 3 months in the studies directly comparing the self-management intervention versus usual care.

References of studies informing direct evidence:
1) Emme-2014

Formulaire

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

Barre de recherche

Sélecteur de Langue

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Isof web COMPAR-EU

Education delivered remotely Vs Usual Care

Formulaire

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb

Barre de recherche

Barre de recherche

Sélecteur de Langue

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Fil d'Ariane

Isof web COMPAR-EU

Education delivered remotely Vs Usual Care

Formulaire

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb