Ruta de navegación
COMPAR-EU Web Intervenciones
Monitoring techniques
See more
This intervention has been tested in for people living with the following disease(s). Click on the name of the disease to see more details.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Hungary, Iran, Malaysia, Poland, Slovakia, Turkey
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 7721
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), It is a 250-bed public convalescent hospital, serving the
community of the eastern district in Hong Kong, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Exersise experts, Healthcare assistant, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Service, Study Investigator, TLC coordinator, exercise specialist, researcher
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Medication use and adherence, Monitoring blood pressure, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction, lifestyle modification in general
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Heart Failure
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United States, Israel, Italy, Poland, United Kingdom, Australia, China, Germany, Belgium, Netherlands, Canada, Brazil, Austria, Spain, Turkey, Sweden, United Arab Emirates, Jordan
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 5000
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Healthcare assistant, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Service, Social worker, study personnel
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Healthy sleep habits, Knowledge of the relation between health behaviors and illness, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Recommendations for this type of intervention | |
| |
Summary of findings | |
Evidence to Decision frameworks | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
COPD
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United Kingdom, United States, Taiwan, Denmark, Spain, Brazil, HK, China, Netherlands, Japan, Iran, Ireland, Indonesia, Australia
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 2790
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator, Healthcare assistant, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Service, medical care or medical staffs
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Recommendations for this type of intervention | |
| |
Summary of findings | |
Evidence to Decision frameworks | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Obesity
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United States, Canada, South Korea, Brazil, Spain, New Zealand, Australia, Malaysia, HK, Germany, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, Netherlands
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 2095
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location, Workplace
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Health professional, Healthcare assistant, Nurses, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Service, exercise specialist
Targeted self-management behaviours: Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Eating behaviours, Fitting in at work, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Recommendations for this type of intervention | |
| |
Summary of findings | |
Evidence to Decision frameworks | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Formulario
Components
Education (E)
Education (E)
Sharing information. This form of support consists in sharing of information about self-management topics like coping with symptoms, diet, exercise, medication, information about what other people are doing, and information about the disease itself, or about any other relevant aspects that could lead to improved self-management, and ultimately better health. This information can be told or distributed in printed materials like a folder or workbook, or via website or DVD.
Examples: Educational session on healthy eating for people with obesity, provision of a printed leaflet on the importance of foot care in diabetes, or a link to a website with information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care.
Monitoring techniques (MT)
Monitoring techniques (MT)
Self-monitoring training and feedback. Training and encouraging people to recognize, monitor, and record behaviours, symptoms, or clinical data. This process may include regular feedback from a clinician, or a synopsis of information registered in a digital tool to encourage you to continue monitoring your illness and behaviours.
Example: Showing a patient how to record blood sugar levels, physical activity, or pain.
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.