Breadcrumb
null
Age: 61.0 years (+/- a standard deviation of 10.7)
Gender: 95 females
Time since diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: N/A
Severity of the disease: 7.2 (+/- a standard deviation of 1.4)
Multi-morbidity: N/A
COMPAR-EU RCTs Web
Robustness of a computer-assisted diabetes self-management intervention across patient characteristics, healthcare settings, and intervention staff
Author: Glasgow, R. E.
Country/countries: N/A
Number of patients participating in the study: 217
This study was focused on patients living with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention analysed in the study: Usual Care Plus
Intervention components: UCP
See more Setting of implementation: Primary care centers (GPs) Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
See more Setting of implementation: Primary care centers (GPs) Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator Targeted self-management behaviours: N/A
Components
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Intervention analysed in the study: Monitoring and action-based behavioural techniques
Intervention components: E+MT+AB
See more Setting of implementation: Primary care centers (GPs) Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator Targeted self-management behaviours: Device management, Eating behaviours, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring
See more Setting of implementation: Primary care centers (GPs) Professionals delivering the intervention: Educator Targeted self-management behaviours: Device management, Eating behaviours, Physical activity /exercise, Self-monitoring
Components
Education (E)
Monitoring techniques (MT)
Action-based behavioural change techniques (AB)
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Outcomes measured in the study
Έκβαση | Μέτρο | Tool |
---|---|---|
Dietary habits | Consumption of fat | N/A |
HbA1C | Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | N/A |
Lipid profile | Total cholesterol / HDL cholesterol ratio | N/A |
Lipid profile | Total cholesterol | N/A |
Lipid profile | HDL-Cholesterol (mmol) | N/A |
Physical activity | Physical activity | N/A |
Patient characteristics
Number of co-morbidities: N/A
Tool: N/A
Risk of Bias of this study
Έκβαση | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding performance | Blinding detection objective outcomes assessment | Attrition incomplete outcome | Incorrect statistical methods | Recruitment bias | Selective outcome reporting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dietary habits - Consumption of fat | ||||||||
HbA1C - Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) | ||||||||
Lipid profile - HDL-Cholesterol (mmol) | ||||||||
Lipid profile - Total cholesterol | ||||||||
Physical activity - Physical activity |
Learn more about the intervention: Monitoring and action-based behavioural techniques
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that also analysed this type of intervention | |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|