Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

null

COMPAR-EU iSoF Web

Emotional-based behavioural techniques and social support lead by peers Vs Usual Care

Patient or population:

Adults with Heart Failure

Setting:

outpatient

Deterministic Network meta-analysis (NMA)

1. Self-efficacy

Footnotes per outcome:
1) a)We rated down the certainty of evidence due to very serious risk of bias, ; b)Number of studies included in the network: 38 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 1 RCT(s) (N=62); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network. The range of follow-up was 2 months in the studies directly comparing the self-management intervention versus usual care.

References of studies informing direct evidence:
1) Siabani-2016

Formular

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

Suchleiste

Sprachauswahl

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

COMPAR-EU iSoF Web

Emotional-based behavioural techniques and social support lead by peers Vs Usual Care

Formular

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb

Suchleiste

Suchleiste

Sprachauswahl

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Breadcrumb

COMPAR-EU iSoF Web

Emotional-based behavioural techniques and social support lead by peers Vs Usual Care

Formular

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb