Breadcrumb
COMPAR-EU Interventionen Web
Education based intervention
See more
This intervention has been tested in for people living with the following disease(s). Click on the name of the disease to see more details.
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: United States
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 7682
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), OUTPATIENT PHARMACY SERVICES, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location, gymnasium
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Healthcare assistant, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Research assistant, Service, exercise trainer
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Healthy sleep habits, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction, Tradicional chinese medicine knowledge
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Heart Failure
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Spain, Australia, United Kingdom, Ireland, Sweden, Iran, Canada, United States, Switzerland, Netherlands, Brazil
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 1385
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Rehabilitation centre, Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Nurses, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Service
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
COPD
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Spain, India, United Kingdom, United States, Brazil, HK, Taiwan, France, Canada, Netherlands, Australia, Israel, China, Denmark, Egypt
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 1753
Setting of implementation: Home-care, Hospital care (hospitalized), Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Health care professionals, Investigator, Nurses, Ocuppational therapist, Pharmacists, Physicians, Physiotherapists, Respiratory therapist, Service, researcher
Targeted self-management behaviours: Asking for professional help or emergency care when needed, Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Communication with healthcare and/or social care providers, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Early recognition of symptoms, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Medication use and adherence, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring, Smoking cessation or reduction
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Obesity
Intervention data |
Patient characteristics |
Country/countries: Australia, Canada, United States, Brazil, France, China, Cuba, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Turkey, Iran
Number of patients participating in the intervention: 2296
Setting of implementation: Community-based care, Home-care, Outpatient care (hospital), Primary care centers (GPs), Virtual location, Well-Being Center of the Central University β€β€Marta Abreu’, Workplace
Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist, Educator, Healthcare assistant, Physicians, Service, researcher
Targeted self-management behaviours: Cessation or reduction of alcohol and other harmful consumptions, Condition-specific behaviours, Device management, Eating behaviours, Handling /managing emotions, Physical activity /exercise, Physical management, Self-monitoring
|
Age:
|
Outcomes measured (Number of RCTs that have measured each outcome) | |
Learn more about the intervention |
|
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that analysed this type of intervention | |
| |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|
Formular
Components
Education (E)
Education (E)
Sharing information. This form of support consists in sharing of information about self-management topics like coping with symptoms, diet, exercise, medication, information about what other people are doing, and information about the disease itself, or about any other relevant aspects that could lead to improved self-management, and ultimately better health. This information can be told or distributed in printed materials like a folder or workbook, or via website or DVD.
Examples: Educational session on healthy eating for people with obesity, provision of a printed leaflet on the importance of foot care in diabetes, or a link to a website with information on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease care.
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.