Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

null

COMPAR-EU Isof Web

Action-based behavioural techniques delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Patient or population:

Adults with COPD

Setting:

outpatient

Deterministic Network meta-analysis (NMA)

1. Physical activity / Muscle strenght / Exercise capacity

2. Qualiy of life / Quality of life (specific-disease instruments)

Footnotes per outcome:
1) We rated down the certainty of evidence due to very serious imprecision and very serious risk of bias
2) a) We rated down the certainty of evidence due to very serious risk of bias, and very serious imprecision;b) Number of studies included in the network: 8 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 1 RCT(s) (N=143); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: 0 comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network. The range of follow-up was 2 months in the studies directly comparing the self-management intervention versus usual care.

References of studies informing direct evidence:
1) Gillespie-2013
2) Gillespie-2013

Form

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

Search Bar

Language Selector

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

COMPAR-EU Isof Web

Action-based behavioural techniques delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Form

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb

Search Bar

Search Bar

Language Selector

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Breadcrumb

COMPAR-EU Isof Web

Action-based behavioural techniques delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Form

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb