Imprecision: Very serious Incoherence: Not serious
Risk of bias: Very serious Inconsistency: Not serious Indirectness: Not serious Publication bias: Undetected
Footnotes per outcome:
1) a)We rated down due to very serious imprecision and very serious risk of bias; b)Number of studies included in the network: 82 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 1 RCT(s) (N=32); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: 0 comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network. The range of follow-up was 4 months in the studies directly comparing the self-management intervention versus usual care.
References of studies informing direct evidence:
This platform has been developed as part of the COMPAR-EU project. The COMPAR-EU project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 754936.
Please consider, this is the Beta version of the COMPAR-EU platform. The platform will be expanded and improved in the next months.