Breadcrumb
null
Age: 69.04 years (+/- a standard deviation of 9.96)
Gender: 29 females
Time since diagnosis of COPD: N/A
Severity of the disease: 31.75 (+/- a standard deviation of 13.68)
Multi-morbidity: N/A
COMPAR-EU RCTs Web
Dietary counselling and food fortification in stable copd: A randomised trial
Link:
10.1136/thx.2008.097352
Author: Weekes, C. E.
Country/countries: United Kingdom
Number of patients participating in the study: 66
This study was focused on patients living with COPD
Intervention analysed in the study: Usual Care Plus
Intervention components: UCP
See more Setting of implementation: Outpatient care (hospital) Professionals delivering the intervention: Nurses Targeted self-management behaviours: Eating behaviours
See more Setting of implementation: Outpatient care (hospital) Professionals delivering the intervention: Nurses Targeted self-management behaviours: Eating behaviours
Components
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Intervention analysed in the study: Emotional-based behavioural techniques
Intervention components: E+EB
See more Setting of implementation: Outpatient care (hospital) Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist Targeted self-management behaviours: Eating behaviours
See more Setting of implementation: Outpatient care (hospital) Professionals delivering the intervention: Dietician/nutritionist Targeted self-management behaviours: Eating behaviours
Components
Education (E)
Emotional-based change techniques (EB)
Individual sessions
A single person receives the self-management support. Examples: self-guided actions (without the participation of any other person) during a clinical visit or within the context of a support or educational session
Face-to-face
Self-management support delivered in a face-to-face encounter between the providers and patients and/or caregivers.
Outcomes measured in the study
Outcome | Measure | Tool |
---|---|---|
Activities of daily living | Activities of daily living (generic instrument) | Townsend disability score |
Physical activity / Muscle strenght | Muscle strength | N/A |
Qualiy of life | Quality of life (specific-disease instruments) | N/A |
Qualiy of life | Quality of life (generic instruments) | N/A |
Patient characteristics
Number of co-morbidities: N/A
Tool: N/A
Risk of Bias of this study
Outcome | Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding performance | Blinding detection objective outcomes assessment | Attrition incomplete outcome | Incorrect statistical methods | Recruitment bias | Selective outcome reporting |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Activities of daily living - Activities of daily living (generic instrument) | ||||||||
Physical activity / Muscle strenght - Muscle strength | ||||||||
Qualiy of life - Quality of life (generic instruments) | ||||||||
Qualiy of life - Quality of life (specific-disease instruments) |
Learn more about the intervention: Emotional-based behavioural techniques
Summary of findings | |
RCTs that also analysed this type of intervention | |
Related cost-effectiveness analysis |
|
To learn more about the cost-effectiveness of self-management interventions check our section on the topic: Cost-effectiveness
|
|
Related contextual analysis |
|
To learn more about the contextual factors that can facilitate or hinder the implementation of a self-management intervention check our section on the topic: Contextual factors
|