Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

null

COMPAR-EU iSoF Web

Action-based behavioural techniques and shared decision making delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Patient or population:

Adults with Obesity

Setting:

outpatient

Deterministic Network meta-analysis (NMA)

1. Weight management / BMI - Body Mass Index

2. Weight management / Weight (Kgs/lbs)

Footnotes per outcome:
1) a)We rated down the certainty of evidence due to, serious imprecision;b)Number of studies included in the network: 8 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 0 RCT(s) (N=0); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: 1 comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network.
2) a) We rated down the certainty of evidence due to serious risk of bias, and serious imprecision; b) Number of studies included in the network: 329 RCTs; Number of studies directly comparing the intervention with usual care: 0 RCT(s) (N=0); Number of comparison(s) informing the indirect estimate: 1 comparison(s). The range of follow up was from 1 to 24 months for the studies included in the whole network.

References of studies informing direct evidence:
N/A

Formular

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

Suchleiste

Sprachauswahl

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

COMPAR-EU iSoF Web

Action-based behavioural techniques and shared decision making delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Formular

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb

Suchleiste

Suchleiste

Sprachauswahl

Summary of findings tables - COMPAR-EU

Breadcrumb

COMPAR-EU iSoF Web

Action-based behavioural techniques and shared decision making delivered in groups Vs Usual Care

Formular

ISof By Intervention: Please rate your experience with the following aspects when using the COMPAR-EU platform:

ComparEuHomePopupWeb